Yahoo! Avatars

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Happy Valentine's Day

How's this for some festive garb?



Perhaps you are wondering what I am doing lazing around in snowflake pajamas and hearts-and-flowers socks at home at two in the afternoon on Valentine's Day? Snow Day! We were sent home yesterday at noon in the sleet and we are off again today, though, truly, the weather is not bad today. Course I haven't seen the roads. You can't see them from where I live. My husband had to call the florist when he got to town today to tell them he will come pick up my Valentine flowers since I am not at work to deliver to. A disappointment, it is true.

Now, I have a Very Important Question:

How do you like your knitting magazines laid out? Do you like the Vogue method where all the samples are laid out in pictorials then the patterns are all bunched in the back? Or do you prefer the Knitter's way where each picture and pattern is featured together and laid out one right after the other throughout the magazine?

I ask because I got my Spring 2007 Interweave Knits in the mail yesterday and they have changed their format; they are now "Vogue"-ing. And I don't like it. I will give them credit for putting 1/4-page size pics in color of each sample on the pages with the patterns -- for years, all you got from Vogue was the pattern number -- but I still don't like. And it is not (just) that I am set in my ways: I have always found that method to be very unhandy. When I look at something I might want to make, I want to know -- while I am looking at it -- what kind of yarn it uses and how much, what the gauge is and how it is put together. I'd write to IWK and tell them all this, but I'm still a little hostile about how they responded the last time I wrote them with criticism, so I'm just going to let my subscription lapse instead. This magazine is available at Wal-Mart now, so I will have a chance when they come out to just buy the ones I want. Then I won't get stuck with any lame issues...like Spring 2007.

Actually, I'm being too harsh calling this issue lame. It is okay. Maybe I'm becoming a crotchety old knitter. I was very disappointed with the Spring Rowan -- and last Fall -- as well. I've hated Knitter's for a very long time and Vogue has always been hit or miss for me. The new magazines for "hip young knitters" are occasionally entertaining, but it hurts me to buy things that say on the front they are "hip." Sigh. Crotchety old knitter....

Labels:

4 Comments:

At 3:34 PM , Blogger quantumtea said...

Bugger. I liked the old way, and I was just wondering about whether to subscribe or not...

 
At 8:42 AM , Blogger Ragged Around the Edges said...

In all honesty, I don't mind the patterns being in the back. It's easier for me to copy and work from them. However, it does frustrate me to be flipping back and forth when considering a project, so I see your point.

 
At 12:44 PM , Blogger Teresa said...

I agree! I don't much care for the new Interweave layout. All that flipping back and forth. Maybe they thought the pattern with the picture was visually disturbing the flow of the magazine.

I don't like things that try to put themselves off as young and hip too. The fact that they're proclaiming it is only a signifier of their totally lack of hip-i-tude. Crotchety knitters unite!

 
At 5:30 PM , Blogger needlefingers said...

I was very disappointed to see the new layout. Guess more people should have kudo'ed them when it was good. Don't know watcha got 'til it's gone. :(

I've not been fond of Knitter's for the past couple of years, but I did have to buy the latest one. There's at least three things I might give a try. I don't think there was anything in it that made me ill.

Sorry to hear your previous comments weren't well received by IK. Knitter's Magazine wouldn't surprise me, but I would like to think IK is classier than that. How sad.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home